Different Learning Styles Essay Sample

Learning is the act of geting cognition through experience and doing mention to things around you. This raises the issue of the difference ways or manners people learn. In this essay I intent to explicate the different types of acquisition manners and besides breakdown into item the geting of cognition with mention to Honey and Mumford survey theory ( 1986 ) who developed the work of David Kolb ( 1984 ) . which consist of the four acquisition rhythm: Concrete experience. Application of thoughts. Abstract construct & A ; coevals and Brooding observation.

It will besides look at illustrations of larning activities that suit the different manners. It is nevertheless questionable as to which larning manner suit who and what ways different people learn and come to the same decision. besides. it has been proven that no 1 has a better acquisition manner than anyone else. The different acquisition manners created by honey and Mumford ( 1986 ) are as follows:

• Activist
• Reflector
• Theorist
• Pragmatist


There are strengths and failings in each of these manners. It has been argued by honey and Mumford ( 1986 ) that acquisition is improved when one truly happen out about the sort of manner he or she produce. and by so making we can place our strengths and failings. therefore bring forthing effectual consequences and obtaining the best quality manner of larning. It is understood that his theory must be applied. other than that larning will non be effectual as it should. therefore all four phases must be completed. Mumford ( 1986 ) stated ’Many people are activists’’ honey in nature and get their accomplishments through concrete undertakings. moreover they learn best by acquiring more involved in concrete undertakings and researching through concern games and competitory teamwork as stated in Kolb’s theory. ACTIVISTS ( concrete Observation ) – This the first phase of the acquisition manner and it is determined that these class of people learn best by acquiring involved in activities or concrete undertaking and from comparatively short undertaking such as concern games and competitory squad work exercising.

They turn to wish seeking anything merely one time. Tend to delight in short term crises- and besides bask contending. Second they are interested in researching new experiences. and eventually acquiring involved with other people. because it is their manner of understanding things better around them. REFLECTORS ( brooding observation ) are referred to in the 2nd phase of honey and Mumford’s which they defined as their four personal manners of larning. This manner relates to kolas larning theory. which he named as Brooding observation. Peoples learn best by sing and reflecting on what has happened in certain state of affairs. They stand back. listen and observe. In other words. they are named ocular scholars. Taking into consideration student and a lector in forepart of a schoolroom where this sort of scholar expression at the organic structure linguistic communication and facial look of the instructor and to the full understand contents of the lesson being thought.

THEORISTS ( abstract conceptualization ) are those who learn best by absorbing new thoughts and are distance from existent life state of affairss. bring forthing features like being attracted to basic rules. theories and system. They besides learn through a hands-on attack. researching the physical universe around them.

PRAGMATISTS ( Planned experience ) are the types that learn best they notice the differences between existent life and new information. some of their features are: researching positively new thoughts or techniques which may use in their state of affairs.

Such people respond to jobs and chances as a challenge. and are besides acute to utilize thoughts from preparation classs.

As stated above. It is been finalised by research workers that there are strength and weekneses in each of the acquisition manners. besides has been confirmed by honey and Munford that larning is enhanced if we think about our acquisition manners so that we can construct on it for more effectual accomplishment. It is understood that his theory must be applied. other than that larning will non be effectual as it should. therefore all four phases must be completed. Honey Mumford ( 1986 ) stated that Many people are militants in nature and get their accomplishments through concrete undertakings. moreover they learn best by acquiring more involved in concrete undertakings and researching through concern games and competitory teamwork as stated in Kolb’s theory.

Apart from all the other signifiers of larning manners. Kolb and Mumford theory still stands as the reliable manners which when we apply to our mundane life. makes much sense and its easy to find your ain. Furthermore after all the above account. persons ever get to the same point. no affair what skill they incorporate. so far as the right attack is used. It is really of import to be cognizant of the sort of manner used in geting cognition so that so as to increase larning chances. Kolb and Mumford theory still holds with our mundane life activities in the sense that it is considered the best manner of geting cognition in all countries. and if applied. effectual acquisition is to the full achieved. ( Laird1985 )

Stated that ‘stimulation through the senses is achieved through a greater assortment of colorss. volume degrees. strong statements. facts presented visually. usage of a assortment of techniques and media’ . All the above acquisition manners suit each other in a manner that. they all apply to the same manner people think. therefore every person falls in each class. This grounds proves to be true and significantly effectual acquisition occurs as a consequence of effectual usage of survey accomplishments. consciousness of the acquisition manners. good clip direction and eventually. motive. On a concluding note. every manner of an person is alone and the least preferable manner should be identified and that makes it much more interesting since that is where the most development will take topographic point and besides promote more chances.

Mention:

Oxford brooks University. Website World Wide Web. Brookes. Ac. uk/services/ocsd/2_learnt chi/theories. htmla Honey. and Mumford ( 1986 ) Analyzing for concern. Study guide 1 ( 40033A )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *