Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility Essay Sample

Often times. many concern determinations are non ever black and white and there are ethical quandary that leaders sometimes face. “Leadership must cognize how the countless human behaviours and interactions fit together like mystifier pieces to make a whole picture” ( Kehoe. pg. 201 ) . Ethical motives is the survey of honorable behaviours and determinations. analyzing what should be done in relation with Corporate Social duty ( CSR ) . Corporate societal duty is a business’s committedness to lend to economic development while bettering the quality of life of the work force and their households every bit good as the community and society at big. ( Investopedia. 2014 ) This instance discusses Ethical motives and Corporate Responsibility by detecting Cinco. a mush processing works.

As a freshly promoted works director for Cinco. Jim is required to turn out his ability to efficaciously pull off several employees who have been with the company much longer than he has. and as a consequence. are more experient and insensitive to alter. “Cinco’s policy is to give each director a freehand in covering with employees. the community and the works itself. It’s chief step of public presentation is the bottom line and the employee’s are keenly cognizant of this fact” ( Ferrell. pg. 1 ) . With this in head. we can presume that if Jim attempts to alter the manner the works is managed. his attempts could really good be overlooked and ignored. The first clip Jim understood an ethical quandary was upon his find of the deceitful H2O sample informations studies being sent to the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) .

In order to avoid a closure. the plant’s waste disposal into the river needed to be in conformity with the EPA criterions. After Jim was told that the mill’s waste disposal into the river exceeded the EPA’s guidelines. Jim ordered trials of the H2O for the last 6 months. After comparing the studies against EPA criterions. he saw no misdemeanor. As a consequence. Jim checked the factory to prove the H2O himself. merely to larn the truth behind the workss operations. The factory had ne’er been modernized to run into EPA criterions. so they needed to deviate the bad waste to one of the four big storage armored combat vehicles. and twice a hebdomad. they dumped it into the river. However. harmonizing to past EPA studies. the factory had ever been in conformity. Jim grew leery and wondered how there was disagreement in the EPA studies. Jim learns of a assorted disbursal of $ 100 a month. and realizes that this was basically a bribe payment to Ralph in order to run the works under the radio detection and ranging. while they continued to go against the new EPA criterions.

It was apparent that this deceitful activity was the cause of the disagreement within the studies. Given the current fortunes. it is critical that Jim see the possible ethical issues at hazard as he examines each of his options as a director. We have identified four options for Jim: A. Meet with higher direction and discourse the branchings of the EPA to discourse to pay for new equipment and run into the EPA criterions. B. Pay Ralph for 2 old ages until he can acquire new equipment. C. Quit or D. Find a sure individual in the media and explicate the state of affairs and have a community member find the issue with the H2O. Potential Ethical Issues ( PEIs )

As the works director. Jim is faced with an ethical quandary that requires him to do a determination that could endanger his place and/or potentially shut down the works. Not merely was a bribe payment to maintain the works open an ethical issue and hazard. but besides the fact that the company was basically perpetrating fraud. Further. by go againsting the EPA criterions and lying about it to the populace. the company was put on the lining an exposure for a hapless repute by pretermiting to be socially responsible. Jim’s ethical issue raises several inquiries. each possessing varying degrees of hazard: Does Jim discontinue his managerial occupation at Cinco to merely let for the corporation to go on sneakily fouling the towns river ( inactivity ) . does he remain at Cinco and do nil in order to maintain his occupation and fulfill his spouse’s wants to go on his calling promotion through the Cinco corporate ranks ( personal addition at the disbursal of harming the community ) . or does he describe Cinco’s environmental misrepresentation and payoff to merely confront immediate expiration ( action with personal effect ) ?

Before analysing each inquiry and their menaces. we must foremost acknowledge the underlining moralss and morality of his issue. Jim’s state of affairs trades more with a higher legal duty to the “greater good” of his and his employee’s community who are deceivingly being affected through the polluting waste. Harmonizing to a research study written on the moralss of whistleblowing. the writer examines the followers: “An ethical behaviour is related foremost of all to the thought of morality. above esteeming the jurisprudence. Ethical motives aims to the bosom of the corporate’s repute and in the terminal that is all you have if you hope to be successful and comfortable in the concern world”

In Urs E. Gattiker’s. Attitudes and Differences in Moral Judgments. he explores the subject of morality as a “behavior of persons who choose. implement. and bear the effects of their actions. Morality is traditionally understood to exercise an impartial restraint on the chase of single involvements in the face of social objectives” Thus. morality is a rule that should steer Jim and our determination to take his ethical inquiries at hazard. and choose a balanced ethical attack that is grounded in morality. yet may let for Jim to be the positive alteration within the company civilization. It is Jim’s moral duty to take to better the state of affairs for himself and community by making an chance for moral alteration. instead than bearing the inactivities at Cinco. Application of the Business Ethics Formula/Matrix ( Exhibit 1 ) As mentioned. there are four options3 available to Jim. We begin by presuming the old director failed at work outing this same quandary. due to the force per unit area from upper direction. as their lone concern was about the bottom line.

The issue has now finally landed in Jim’s custodies. disputing him to do an ethical determination that non merely promotes an ethical criterion. but besides one that doesn’t harm his calling. household. employees. community and the company’s image. Harmonizing to John Boatright. “the best defence is a good discourtesy. And the best defence against engagement in incorrect making is being prepared for organisational challenges that will necessarily prove your personal values. moral beliefs. and committedness to making the right thing. ” The first three options do non let the immediate reaction needed from upper direction and make non let Jim to fix for unanticipated circumstance. Besides. option B can take to worse. and while discontinuing ( C ) is smart. Jim could be wrongfully targeted by the company. We have developed an option for Jim that proves to be tactful and yields the best result. We agree that Option D. happening a sure individual in the media and explicate the state of affairs and have a community member find the issue with the H2O ( option D ) will give the best result.

Based on the 5 beginnings for ethical decision-making. we agree that Jim’s solution revolves around a concern for the common good of the community. By maintaining in head the societal duty of the company and the legal hazards at manus. Jim will try to anonymously expose the company’s misdemeanors against the EPA to the media. We believe that by making this. it will coerce the company to turn to the environmental concerns. and fix the job in order to avoid a closure or a hapless repute. This determination. in bend. protects Jim’s place in the company and to society. giving him the freedom to discontinue. while besides guaranting the works remains socially responsible. Appraisal of what we learned

In hindsight. we agree that this instance has guided us in exhaustively understanding ethical decision-making. We learned that at some point in our calling. we may be confronted with a state of affairs that presents an ethical quandary. In attempts to continue a professional standing. we believe that any ethical determinations should advance a conformity with a company’s nucleus Code of Ethics. We realize that ethical quandary will non ever have an obvious solution. but when it involves interrupting the jurisprudence or go againsting ordinances. the solution is distinct. In Jim’s instance. we learn that struggles of involvement and issues sing confidentiality are issues that pose an ethical hazard affecting a deceitful act being committed by the company. As a professional. Jim has the duty and a responsibility to pattern good judgement. Our function is to understand the wider deductions and the impact of the issue on the concern. and society.

Exhibit 1

Prism
Make Nothing
Make Something
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Utilitarian






Rights

Fairness + Justice

Common Good

Bibliography

A Framework for Thinking Ethically. ( 2009. May 1 ) . A Model for Thinking Ethically. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. scu. edu/ethics/practicing/decision/framework. hypertext markup language Boatright. J. R. ( 2013 ) Confronting Ethical Dilemmas in the Workplace. Fiscal Analysts Journal. Pp. 6-9.

Bunget. O. -C. . Bunget. Ovidiu-Constantin. & A ; David-Sobolevschi. Maria-Iulia. ( 2009 ) . Ethical motives and internal audit: whistleblowing issues. ( Bunget. Ovidiu-Constantin and David-Sobolevschi. Maria-Iulia ( 2009 ) : Ethical motives and internal audit: whistleblowing issues. Published in: Revista Audit Financiar. Vol. 7. No. 9 ( September 2009 ) : pp. 43-51. ) Corporate Social Responsibility Definition | Investopedia. ( n. d. ) . Investopedia. ( 2014. September 27 ) .

Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. investopedia. com/terms/c/corp-social-responsibility. asp Ferrell. Fraedrich. Ferrell Business Ethics Decision Making and Cases 6th Ed.
Ethical motives and Corporate Social Responsibility- Cinco Corporation Kehoe. William J. Business Ethics 13/14 McGraw-Hill 2013

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *